REJECTED — Judges did not all approve

Will Howard Lutnick leave the Trump administration before 2027?

View market on Polymarket →

Why it looked attractive

New leg among the top events by volume (24h volume $4,468); picked by code for a first check.

Why it was rejected

Council round2: 0/3 approve (ruleset v4). Objections: [openai/gpt-6-astra] REJECT (confidence 9): My first objection remains unresolved: the rebuttal supplies citations for a replacement baseline but no quantitative justification for increasing 1.2–1.5% to 18%, and it repeats the unsupported claim of two explicit commitments to stay through January 2029. My second objection is only clarified, not resolved: asserting that 18% covers future-effective announcements does not demonstrate that the departure data capture that broader trigger or provide an adjustment for it. At the actual NO purchase price, the revised estimate implies $0.820 − $0.780 = $0.040 expected profit per share, approximately 5.13% before fees, but that edge remains conditional on an inadequately supported probability. [anthropic/claude-opus-5.5] REJECT (confidence 7): Objection 1 is not resolved. The sourced attrition data (4 of roughly 22-26 seats over 22 months) gives an unconditional 7-week baseline of about 1.2-1.5%, which contradicts the original 8-10% figure. The jump from that baseline to 0.18 is a 12x uplift asserted without any quantification, so the estimate is still not derived from the evidence. The rebuttal also repeats the claim that spokespeople "twice" went on record saying he stays through 2029, which I flagged in round 1 as unsupported; only the Commerce statement to Newsweek is evidenced, and no second statement was produced. Objection 2 is answered adequately in principle, since an announcement-based probability is a coherent target. But with the revised 0.18 the edge shrinks to 0.82 − 0.78 = $0.04 per share (about 5%), and it now rests on an unsupported number and a repeated unverified claim. [moonshotai/kimi-k3.1-pro] REJECT (confidence 8): The rebuttal provides checkable sources for the attrition baseline and clarifies that the estimate targets pre-deadline announcements, but it does not establish that the departure-derived baseline captures future-effective announcements.

Considered betting
NO (it doesn't happen)
Our estimate
15% chance YES
Would have paid
78¢ per NO share
Market
23% chance YES
Date
today
Key figures
  • Lutnick leave admin before 2027: market yes 0.23, ask 0.24
Evidence sources
Council verdicts
VerdictModelConfidenceCost
REJECT GPT-6 Astra 8/10 $0.0395
APPROVE Claude opus 5.5 6/10 $0.0325
APPROVE Kimi K3 7/10 $0.0201
REJECT GPT-6 Astra 9/10 $0.0400
REJECT Claude opus 5.5 7/10 $0.0376
REJECT Kimi K3 8/10 $0.0259